Repository logo
 

Seen But Not Heard: Consitututional Questions Surrounding Social Media Policies Affecting Student-Athletes

dc.contributor.authorEtherton, Elizabeth
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-16T22:11:26Z
dc.date.available2016-06-16T22:11:26Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstract(11 Willamette Sports L.J., no. 2, 2014, at 41). This article focuses on the constitutional implications of universities enacting social media policies. Part II discusses types of social media, focusing on Facebook and Twitter, which are the most popular media outlets among college athletes. Part III explores existing social media policies from the NCAA and professional sports leagues, while defining the two methods used by universities: social media monitoring and social media bans. Part IV analyzes the implications of social media policies for the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments, concluding that universities and the NCAA have the right to impose social media policies under existing Supreme Court precedents.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10177/5629
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleSeen But Not Heard: Consitututional Questions Surrounding Social Media Policies Affecting Student-Athletesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
11 WSLJ no. 2 spring 2014 Etherton.pdf
Size:
331.07 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: